Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewer Guidelines

To enhance the quality of journal publications, Green Economics Review invites experts in the field of Green Economy to join as reviewers. Your expertise and contributions are essential to ensuring that the manuscripts published meet the highest academic standards and contribute meaningfully to the development of Green Economics.

Qualifications

Potential reviewers should meet the following criteria:

  1. Hold a Master's or Doctoral degree in a relevant field.
  2. Have expertise in areas related to Green Economy, sustainable resource management, environmental economics, or social justice.
  3. Possess experience as a reviewer for scientific journals.
  4. Have published articles in internationally reputable journals with significant citations.

Review Focus Areas

Reviewers are encouraged to evaluate manuscripts based on the following aspects:

Presentation

  • Does the manuscript present a cohesive argument?
  • Are the ideas logically organized and clearly articulated?

Writing

  • Is the title reflective of the manuscript's content?
  • Is the writing concise, coherent, and easy to follow?

Length

  • Identify sections that should be elaborated, shortened, merged, or removed.

Title

  • Does the title accurately capture the manuscript's content in a clear, concise, and engaging way?

Abstract

  • Does the abstract cover the following elements: research background, objectives, methods, findings, and contributions/implications?

Introduction

The introduction should:

  1. Provide the background of the study and identify research gaps being addressed.
  2. Present relevant theories and literature that guide the research.
  3. Highlight the originality and significance of the work.
  4. Clearly articulate the objectives of the study in a narrative format.
  5. Include hypothesis development (if applicable), based on theoretical reviews and expressed directionally if relevant.

Method

  • Are all research procedures clearly explained?
  • Are the study variables, research subjects, and instruments (including item numbers and reliability coefficients) identified?
  • Are data analysis techniques thoroughly described?
  • Is sufficient information provided to enable replication of the research?

Results

  • Does the results section adequately describe the study outcomes?
  • Are data presented in processed forms (tables, figures) with clear descriptions?
  • Do the tables, charts, or figures effectively illustrate the analyses?
  • Do the results address the research questions or hypotheses?

Discussion

  • Are the results compared and related to existing literature?
  • Does the discussion provide substantial meaning to the findings?
  • Are the research implications clearly described?
  • Are the strengths and limitations of the study addressed (without repetition of the results section)?

Conclusion

  • Are the conclusions presented effectively, based on the results and discussions?
  • Does the conclusion synthesize the study’s findings and highlight new contributions to Green Economics?
  • Are the findings clearly linked to the development of Green Economy theory, policy, or practice?

Your constructive feedback is crucial to the academic rigor and impact of Green Economics Review. Thank you for contributing your expertise to the advancement of this field.